Patriotism is a term that is often banded about these days. It has come to mean everything from wrapping yourself in green for a rugby or soccer match, to defending 'our nation' from immigration to the construction of a capitalist economy to 'provide jobs for our people'. Indeed in the American context the term patriotism has also been used to justify bombing the crap out of any country that, with a puppet government can supply the US with oil and power. (The youngfella offers no apology for this interpretation of U.S foreign policy)
However it is in the Irish scenario that I am really interested in here. Should we accept the free and easy interpretations of patriotism that exist in Ireland today? It would seem to me that patriotism is a badge of convenience in today's society.
For example, the FF and PD government would have us believe that they are true patriots who are building 'a buoyant economy for the sake of our children'. Well if they are so patriotic, one has to ask the question why are they so adamant to sell part of the Irish nation to put a pipeline through where the local community obviously doesn't want it? How does that sit with the Democratic Programme of the First Dáil?
We declare that the nation's sovereignty extends not only to all its material posessions, (but also to)the nation's soil and all its resources, all the wealth and all the wealth producing processes within the nation
How is it patriotic to put the interests of multi-national capitalism before that of the Irish people. To me this does a great dis-service to Ireland and is fundamentally an anti-patriotic act. The same could be said of the campaign to support the Nice Treaty. Those who sold us this federalist abomination also used the 'patriotic' argument, citing all that the EU had supposedly done for us etc. The same individuals who would have condemned partis like Sinn Féin for flying tricolours at election counts, were doing the very same when the Irish people were eventually cojoled into accepting Nice.
Simply put, I refuse to accept that patriotism should be narrowed down to supporting your country in sporting events or defending your government's actions under the pretence of 'the national interest'. Patriotism is far more complex than this. I presume most readers of this blog would profess to loving their families. However this love should not mean that all activities of our family members should automatically be justified. A rapist who happens to be your brother is still a rapist, why should our family loyalties force us to defend such actions? Part of being a patriot, in my view is striving for your country to be better, to be something to look up to. The real question should not be whether we love our country, but whether we love it enough to change it. James Connolly summed up the question of patriotism very well.
Ireland, as distinct from her people, means nothing to me; and the man who is bubbling over with love and enthusiasm for 'Ireland', and can yet pass unmoved through our streets and witness all the wrong and the suffering, the shame and the degradation wrought upon the people of Ireland, yea, wrought by Irishmen upon Irish men and women, without burning to end it, is, in my opinion, a fraud and a liar in his heart, no matter how much he loves that combination of chemical elements he is pleased to call Ireland. *
So let's be true patriots by seeking to build an Ireland that is truly deserving of our love, an Ireland that is worthy of the Proclamation and the Democratic Programme.
Saturday, February 24, 2007
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
No Certain Road to The Republic
For members of Sinn Féin, last Sunday was a significant day. They were asked to endorse joining the policing boards in the 6 counties. That this was accomplished was no surprise, however, the margin of victory was. For those who were opposed to this decision or may have been disillusioned by it, there may be some difficult decisions to make. Is the SF strategy the way to go? is the main question they have to ask themselves. To be honest, I do not feel it is my place to make a prognosis on this. That is a decision for individuals to make themselves.
However, what is important to remember is that Irish republicanism is broader than Sinn Féin or any group. We all need to get back to basics. The Proclamation and the Democratic programme need to be at the centre of any republican socialist's mind, regardless of what organisation, if any, they attach to. Once people prioritise the ideology, it is a question of interpretation as to what is the best way forward. I hope in all this that those who have decided or will decide to leave SF will not be villified by those who still see SF as the correct route to the Republic. In turn, they should not be unduly hostile towards ex comrades who decide to stay.
None of us have all the answers. We live in a big bad world which has no place for certainty. Anyone who goes off in search of certainty, in any aspect of life , and republicanism is no different in this regard, will find themselves lost very quickly. All any of us can do is follow our hearts as well as our heads and keep our own integrity. As long as the Republic lives in our hearts, it can never die. This is not to say that we don't have a hard job to do, but it needs to be done from a position of principle, that does not allow for petty inter-organisational squabbles, because that will set back the pursuit of the Republic irretrievably.
However, what is important to remember is that Irish republicanism is broader than Sinn Féin or any group. We all need to get back to basics. The Proclamation and the Democratic programme need to be at the centre of any republican socialist's mind, regardless of what organisation, if any, they attach to. Once people prioritise the ideology, it is a question of interpretation as to what is the best way forward. I hope in all this that those who have decided or will decide to leave SF will not be villified by those who still see SF as the correct route to the Republic. In turn, they should not be unduly hostile towards ex comrades who decide to stay.
None of us have all the answers. We live in a big bad world which has no place for certainty. Anyone who goes off in search of certainty, in any aspect of life , and republicanism is no different in this regard, will find themselves lost very quickly. All any of us can do is follow our hearts as well as our heads and keep our own integrity. As long as the Republic lives in our hearts, it can never die. This is not to say that we don't have a hard job to do, but it needs to be done from a position of principle, that does not allow for petty inter-organisational squabbles, because that will set back the pursuit of the Republic irretrievably.
Saturday, January 20, 2007
Religious Fundamentalism and Irish Republicanism
In recent times, much has been made about the possibility that Gerry McGeough may be running as an anti-policng candidate in the assembly elections in the 6 counties. This speculation is made all the more interesting by the fact that McGeough, who left Sinn Féin 3 years ago, is the editor of 'the Hibernian' magazine, a right-wing, catholic fundamentalist publication linked to the AOH. While those proposing his candidacy may wish it to be purely based on the policing issue, the truth is this will not be possible.
I have no interest in a personal vendetta against Mr McGeough, so I will focus instead on the philosophy espoused by Catholic Fundamentalism and, in my view, its complete incompatibility with Irish Republicanism.
For one thing, and this should be quite obvious, the blatant religious sectarianism of such people completely flies in the face of our history as republicans. For those who believe that their is something intrinsically and purely Irish about Catholicism, yet claim to be of the republican position, I wonder how do they feel going to Bodenstown to commemorate a protestant republican? How do they feel about the aim of uniting Catholic, Protestant and Dissenter? Can the principle ofcivil and religious liberty of all our citizens be convincingly espoused by people who passionately believe that there is something inherently superior about the catholic faith. This is nothing against practicing catholics, I know many good republicans who are practicing catholics, (although most I know personally tend to share by scepticism about organised religion) what I question is the republicanism of those with prescriptive sense of morality based on the teachings of one faith. (Or their own restrictive interpretations of those teachings)
The attitude towards homosexuality of such groups is certainly anathema to me as a republican. The assumption that homosexuality is some sort of perversion is hardly compatible with a quest for equality and freedom. Apart from anything else, this attitude flies in the face of all concepts of basic decency. Quite frankly the sexual activities of consensual homosexual adults should be of no concern to anyone besides those adults themselves, in the same way as the sexual activities of a heterosexual couple would be no one's business only their own.
People of this mindset are stuck in the dark ages and want to bring the rest of us back to their fantasy world where fundamentalist catholic dogma dictates how we should live our lives. Such people have no place in Irish republicanism, a progressive philosophy based on social justice. People espousing such out-dated and quite frankly, disturbing dogma, may be a lot of things, but they are certainly not republicans.
I have no interest in a personal vendetta against Mr McGeough, so I will focus instead on the philosophy espoused by Catholic Fundamentalism and, in my view, its complete incompatibility with Irish Republicanism.
For one thing, and this should be quite obvious, the blatant religious sectarianism of such people completely flies in the face of our history as republicans. For those who believe that their is something intrinsically and purely Irish about Catholicism, yet claim to be of the republican position, I wonder how do they feel going to Bodenstown to commemorate a protestant republican? How do they feel about the aim of uniting Catholic, Protestant and Dissenter? Can the principle ofcivil and religious liberty of all our citizens be convincingly espoused by people who passionately believe that there is something inherently superior about the catholic faith. This is nothing against practicing catholics, I know many good republicans who are practicing catholics, (although most I know personally tend to share by scepticism about organised religion) what I question is the republicanism of those with prescriptive sense of morality based on the teachings of one faith. (Or their own restrictive interpretations of those teachings)
The attitude towards homosexuality of such groups is certainly anathema to me as a republican. The assumption that homosexuality is some sort of perversion is hardly compatible with a quest for equality and freedom. Apart from anything else, this attitude flies in the face of all concepts of basic decency. Quite frankly the sexual activities of consensual homosexual adults should be of no concern to anyone besides those adults themselves, in the same way as the sexual activities of a heterosexual couple would be no one's business only their own.
People of this mindset are stuck in the dark ages and want to bring the rest of us back to their fantasy world where fundamentalist catholic dogma dictates how we should live our lives. Such people have no place in Irish republicanism, a progressive philosophy based on social justice. People espousing such out-dated and quite frankly, disturbing dogma, may be a lot of things, but they are certainly not republicans.
Friday, January 19, 2007
Executive Decisions
Sinn Féin currently faces a tough decision over whether or not to endorse joining the policing boards. While there are very specific reasons why policing in its own right will be hard for republicans in the 6 county context, some of the jusifications being given for endorsement are in themselves problematic. There seems to be very much a carrot and stick approach to policing. The carrot, evidently, is participation in a power sharing executive. However, when we get back to basics, this is hardly as enticing as it is made to sound.
Sinn Féin's primary partners in any such executive, based on current electoral strength, would be the ludicrously misnamed 'Democratic Unionist Party'. Let us not forget that it was their stringent opposition to basic civil rights that exacerbated the conditions which created the conflict in the 6 counties. While we all accept the 'moving on' argument, sharing government with such people surely cannot be easy. Especially baring in mind that SF are constitutionally bound to the quest for not only a United Ireland, but a Democratic Socialist Republic. How does this fit with a party who proudly espouse all the worst excesses of christian fundamentalism. How does a party that supports gay marriage sit down in government with a party whose representatives (Lord Morrow) campaign to overturn legislation which makes it illegal to discrimanate against homosexuals?
How does a party which has set its stall out so strongly against privatisation throughout the island, implement an administrative system with a truly myopic dependence on privatisation through the Public Private partnerships (PPPs) and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI)?
While in a party that is often viewed in the context of militant republicanism, it is tempting to view policing as a stand aone issue in simplistic constitutional terms, it is important to realise that there are broader problems based on the political and socio-economic objectives that SF has ostensibly tied itself to as a party of the radical left.
Sinn Féin's primary partners in any such executive, based on current electoral strength, would be the ludicrously misnamed 'Democratic Unionist Party'. Let us not forget that it was their stringent opposition to basic civil rights that exacerbated the conditions which created the conflict in the 6 counties. While we all accept the 'moving on' argument, sharing government with such people surely cannot be easy. Especially baring in mind that SF are constitutionally bound to the quest for not only a United Ireland, but a Democratic Socialist Republic. How does this fit with a party who proudly espouse all the worst excesses of christian fundamentalism. How does a party that supports gay marriage sit down in government with a party whose representatives (Lord Morrow) campaign to overturn legislation which makes it illegal to discrimanate against homosexuals?
How does a party which has set its stall out so strongly against privatisation throughout the island, implement an administrative system with a truly myopic dependence on privatisation through the Public Private partnerships (PPPs) and the Private Finance Initiative (PFI)?
While in a party that is often viewed in the context of militant republicanism, it is tempting to view policing as a stand aone issue in simplistic constitutional terms, it is important to realise that there are broader problems based on the political and socio-economic objectives that SF has ostensibly tied itself to as a party of the radical left.
Making Sense of Irish Society
As I outlined in my initial post, the purpose of this blog is essentially to observe what I see as the inherent madness of Irish society and to discuss possible avenues where the disenfranchised may pursue radical social change.
From the outset, I think it is important to state that Irish society is not that much different from any capitalist society or so called liberal democracy. A powerful elite are at the helm and maintain their power by dictating the norms and values in society. The Mickey Mouse political system that we laughably call a democracy in this country, serves as a perfect tool for the subtle oppression of the Irish people. First of all they make sure that people technically have a right to choose what selection of self serving, egotistical fools are going to help destroy our country for the next few years. Then, they make their lack of concern for people so ridiculously transparent that most people will not vote and when those most disenfranchised by your political incompetence, do not vote, they simply use that as justification for inaction.
Then they go on the offensive. When challenged as to the nature of the society they are administering, they get personal. All of a sudden, the people espousing change are 'dangerous radicals' 'soft on terrorism' ' a threat to democracy' and whatever other half arsed cliche they can come up with. Then, through their truly pathetic media lapdogs, they can impart these slurs on the consciousness of the apathetic, so that rather than grabbing Irish society by the balls, like they should be doing, they turn even more hostile to those seeking chnge than to those implementing inequality in the first place. The subsequent disengagement from society allows the political domination of the status quo to continue.
In truth, it is very hard to blame people for this attitude. Most people are inherently decent and are trying to do the best they can for themselves and their families. A survival instinct kicks in and social change is not part of this equation. However, I am in no doubt that the majority of people would embrace radical social change, if those advocating same would come together to put forth a coherent alternative. The unfortunate reality is that the Irish left are in a pathetic state and show no signs of copping on and putting such an alternative in place. They are too obsessed with their childish belief in 'being right'. Quite frankly this is no good to the working class people of Ireland. The problem facing us is that if a viable alternative for social change is not put in place soon, we may miss our chance entirely.
From the outset, I think it is important to state that Irish society is not that much different from any capitalist society or so called liberal democracy. A powerful elite are at the helm and maintain their power by dictating the norms and values in society. The Mickey Mouse political system that we laughably call a democracy in this country, serves as a perfect tool for the subtle oppression of the Irish people. First of all they make sure that people technically have a right to choose what selection of self serving, egotistical fools are going to help destroy our country for the next few years. Then, they make their lack of concern for people so ridiculously transparent that most people will not vote and when those most disenfranchised by your political incompetence, do not vote, they simply use that as justification for inaction.
Then they go on the offensive. When challenged as to the nature of the society they are administering, they get personal. All of a sudden, the people espousing change are 'dangerous radicals' 'soft on terrorism' ' a threat to democracy' and whatever other half arsed cliche they can come up with. Then, through their truly pathetic media lapdogs, they can impart these slurs on the consciousness of the apathetic, so that rather than grabbing Irish society by the balls, like they should be doing, they turn even more hostile to those seeking chnge than to those implementing inequality in the first place. The subsequent disengagement from society allows the political domination of the status quo to continue.
In truth, it is very hard to blame people for this attitude. Most people are inherently decent and are trying to do the best they can for themselves and their families. A survival instinct kicks in and social change is not part of this equation. However, I am in no doubt that the majority of people would embrace radical social change, if those advocating same would come together to put forth a coherent alternative. The unfortunate reality is that the Irish left are in a pathetic state and show no signs of copping on and putting such an alternative in place. They are too obsessed with their childish belief in 'being right'. Quite frankly this is no good to the working class people of Ireland. The problem facing us is that if a viable alternative for social change is not put in place soon, we may miss our chance entirely.
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
Welcome To The Youngfella's Blog
Welcome to the blog of 'The Youngfella' the cyber voice of an angry young radical trying to make sense of the enigma that is Irish society. A society where dignified poverty has been replaced by an uncomfrtable wealth, which leaves the cloud of inequality all around us. Many people are not content with it, many others wish to change it, but the first thing we have to do is observe it. Check in here intermittently to see my observations.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)